Why is this tutorial being offered, when do I have to complete it, how long will it take and what will I get out of it?
You are required to successfully complete this tutorial before your Application for Retrospective Review will be processed or reviewed by Windsor Regional Hospital Research Ethics Board.
Researchers are asked to complete this brief tutorial to ensure that they are aware of the privacy issues which arise in research involving the retrospective review, and to ensure that they are aware of how to complete the Application for Retrospective Review form so that there will be no delay in the approval process.
The tutorial will take 15 minutes to complete. It consists of:
Read the content, answer the quiz below and upon successful competition, you will receive a certificate by email.
Please send questions or comments about the tutorial to WRH REB at firstname.lastname@example.org.
CHART REVIEW TUTORIAL
Physicians who are affiliated with Windsor Regional Hospital and maintain their own patient records for healthcare purposes (i.e. records which are not included in the health records of Windsor Regional Hospital), are also considered to be HICs.
HIC's are permitted to authorize designated agents to act on behalf of the HIC in relation to the HIC's activities, including the collection, use, and disclosure of PHI.
Agents are not HICs in and of themselves. Agents may be internal or external to the HIC. The HIC has a responsibility to ensure that its agents are informed of the provisions of PHIPA and that they comply with them.
PHIPA also applies to all researchers who obtain PHI from any HIC.
Research is defined in PHIPA in substantially the same way as it is defined in the Tri-Council Policy Statement, i.e. "a systematic investigation designed to develop or establish principles, facts or generalizable knowledge, or any combination of these, and includes the development, testing, and evaluation of research".
PHIPA specifically allows for either express or implied consent, requiring express consent in certain defined circumstances.
Implied consent is consent that may be assumed to have been given, if it is reasonable, under all of the circumstances to assume that it has been given. PHIPA expressly provides that a HIC which receives PHI about an individual from the individual or from another HIC for the purposes of providing health care to the individual, is entitled to assume that it has the individual's implied consent to collect, use or disclose the information for the purposes of providing health care (not research) to the individual, unless the HIC that receives the PHI is aware that the individual has expressly withheld or withdrawn the consent.
PHIPA specifically provides [Section 18(3)] that consent must be express and not implied if a HIC is disclosing PHI to:
A person who is not a HIC (e.g. a researcher or a research assistant) OR
For a purpose other than providing health care or assisting in providing health care. (e.g. research)
Most, but not all, of the research conducted at Windsor Regional Hospital will entail obtaining express consent from the participants in the research. Most of the research will have undergone a research review by the Research Ethics Board, and the consent form (and process for obtaining it), will have been approved by the Research Ethics Board.
IF A RESEARCHER HAS REB APPROVAL FOR HIS RESEARCH AND HE OBTAINS EXPRESS CONSENT FROM ALL PATIENTS TO CONDUCT THE RESEARCH, DOES HE HAVE TO DO ANYTHING MORE TO COMPLY WITH PHIPA?
Generally, if the researcher has REB approval and provides for express consent, the requirements of PHIPA will have been met.
Some research, particularly large epidemiological studies, would not be possible to conduct if express consent to the use and disclosure of personal health information had to be obtained from every individual involved.
PHIPA expressly recognizes this reality and provides for the possibility of a waiver of express consent for research purposes, provided that certain criteria apply, and specific requirements are met.
A HIC cannot use or disclose personal health information for research purposes, without the express consent of the individual, unless the provisions of Section 44 of PHIPA are complied with.
The Act requires that the HIC obtain from the researcher a written application, a research plan that has been approved by the Research Ethics Board, and a copy of the Research Ethics Board approval.
If you work under a research plan approved outside of Ontario, you must follow the same requirements that researchers whose plans are approved in Ontario must follow.
Researchers may use or disclose PHI originating outside of Ontario for research purposes without consent if an REB (or other body Outside of Ontario responsible for approved research) has approved the research.
Yes. The Medical Student/Resident is considered to be an agent of the HIC. If the Medical Student/Resident wishes to access hospital health records for research purposes, this would be considered a use of the PHI by the HIC for non-healthcare purposes. The Medical Student/Resident is required to obtain REB approval before proceeding with the research, and if the express consent of the patient is not contemplated, the criteria for granting a waiver must be met.
If the Medical Student/Resident develops a research study and creates a database of PHI obtained through the review of patient health records, is the Medical Student/Resident permitted to take the database when he/she leaves the hospital?
No. If PHI is collected from within the hospital, in other words, it is PHI in the custody of the hospital as HIC, then the PHI must stay within the hospital and it does not belong to the Medical Student/Registry or any other agent of the hospital.
The researcher is designing a study to address the above question and will submit it to the REB for review and approval. In the proposed study, the researcher plans to as Laboratory Services in the Hospital to flag all abnormal serum bilirubins in adult patients and then plans to go through the patients' charts to find out whether the patients are taking specific medications. For those patients with abnormal test results, the researcher will ask the attending physician to contact their patient, asking the patients' permission for the researcher to contact them. Does Lab Services have the right to disclose this information to the researcher?
Yes. Prior to the Lab disclosing the PHI to the researcher, the Lab must be assured that the researcher has obtained REB and Health Records approval and if the express consent of the patients is not contemplated, the criteria for granting a waiver must be met.
Is it acceptable for the researcher to then propose to the physician that the researcher pay for someone to contact the patient on the physician's behalf?
What if the physician doesn't want to be involved with this at all? Let's say they do not want to give their patients the opportunity to be asked if they are interested in participating. Assuming this is really "important research", what are the researcher's options?
The physician (or his/her agent) must obtain the individual's express consent before the researcher can contact the individual, however, the physician may appoint someone to act as their agent to contact the patient. The physician could approve the researcher to contact the patient on his/her behalf as an authorized agent. However, best practice (see CIHR Privacy Best Practices Guideline) would caution the physician with respect to the patient's expectations with respect to access, undue influence, etc.
The REB would need to approve the research plan which details who is contacting the patient, the telephone or contact script to be used, etc.
It would be more appropriate to offer to compensate the physician for his/her staff's time spent contacting the patients. For the person to be the authorized agent of the physician, she/he should be paid and supervised by the physician, not by the researcher.
1995 Lens Avenue, Windsor, ON N8W 1L9
1030 Ouellette Avenue, Windsor, ON N9A 1E1